|
|
|
Articles: Crises of Economic Ideology |
|
|
|
|
HTML |
Conceived in a moment of crisis, IPE set out to address the fundamental question of how far global capitalism could be collectively managed. Looking back to the 1930s, however, IPE failed to explain the crisis of the 1970s. Germann argues that the neglect of this foundational puzzle undermines the ability of IPE to offer an integrated analysis of international cooperation and conflict.
|
|
|
Everyday Neoliberalism and the Subjectvity of Crisis: Post-Political Control in the Era of Financial Turmoil, by Nicholas Kiersey (pp. 23-44)
|
|
HTML |
As the financial crisis has progressed Constructivist IPE scholarship has turned to social norms and expectations not only as variables explaining its origins, but also as factors constraining its resolution. In this article Kiersey suggests that such work avoids discussing the fundamental role of capitalist practices of valorisation in sustaining this life. |
|
|
'Grey in Grey': Crisis, Critique, Change, by Benjamin Noys (pp. 45-60) |
|
HTML |
Noys' essay reflects on the global financial crisis of 2008 to assess a number of theorisations of critique and change. While the recent crisis has given traction to Marxism as a form of critique, the articulation of that critique to actual change has been left hanging.
|
|
|
Dialogue: Ideologies of Economic Crisis |
|
|
|
|
HTML |
In this article, Andrew Kliman responds to Bichler and Nitzan’s recent paper on
‘Systemic Fear, Modern Finance and the Future of Capitalism’ (2010). He then goes on to raise a series of issues concerning the critique of Marxian value theory which these authors put forward in their book Capital as Power (Nitzan and Bichler, 2009).
|
|
|
Kliman on Systemic Fear: A Rejoinder, by Shimshon Bichler and Jonathan
Nitzan (pp. 93-118) |
|
HTML |
In this rejoinder, Bichler and Nitzan address the points raised in Kliman's article.
|
|
|
Marx, Systemic Fear and Capitalists' Convictions: A Reply to Bichler and Nitzan, by Andrew Kliman (pp. 119-126) |
|
HTML |
In this final installment to the dialogue section, Kliman responds to some of the points raised by Bichler and Nitzan in their rejoinder.
|
|
|
Commentary: Order and Change in North Africa and Beyond |
|
|
Egypt and the Failure of Realism, by Joe Hoover (pp. 127-137) |
|
|
Hoover argues that the recent upheaval in Egypt has exposed the limits of realism in International Relations.
|
|
|
Political Semantics of the Arab Revolts/Uprisings/Riots/Insurrections/
Revolutions, by Nathan Coombs (pp. 138-146)
|
|
|
Should recent events in North Africa and the Middle East be considered as uprisings or revolutions? Coombs' theoretical commentary unpacks the subjective core of the matter by way of an extrapolation on the thought of Alain Badiou.
|
|
|
| |
Reviews |
|
|
| |
Pathologies of Capital: David Harvey's ‘The Enigma of Capital’, by Matthew Morgan (pp. 147-150)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
